Dingpolitik: from an interview with Bruno Latour. Link: re-public: ing democracyRe-public. K.K.: You talk about the demon of the. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and Latour introduces the stakes of incorporating objects into politics. Bruno Latour. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.B. Latour – – Krisis

Author: Grogar Kajikasa
Country: Luxembourg
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 16 July 2018
Pages: 113
PDF File Size: 3.59 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.19 Mb
ISBN: 530-2-14597-800-4
Downloads: 87928
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tek

First of all by altering the view on the form and metaphor of state. Within that same line of thought, the digital is often taking idngpolitik for granted maybe too much, where often the step towards WHO and HOW data is manipulated is left out of the loop.

Matt Sleat – – Political Theory 42 3: MIT Press, http: International Law and the Prevention of Genocide.

This entry has no external links. This, asserts Latour, is what the exhibition in question explores.

Dingpolitik and an internet of things

Here Latour ends by providing a set of guidelines if you will, or parameters for success of dingpolitik, summed up in my own interpretation:. While often in history, this advice has been taken too literally in the shape of spheres and domes, maybe it is time to look for other places of publicity, than the rather archaic town halls, churches and parliaments.


The lstour of performing research into the topic of an Internet of Things lies in the fact that, although seemingly the concept has faded into the background, reality might be catching up.

It is time to go back to things. There is a need to investigate how and through what medium the matters of concern are discussed.

From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik (Latour) | Technology and Culture Reading Group

Navigation Main page Recent changes Random page Help. Find it on Scholar.

Metz dinpgolitik – History of Political Thought 3 2: What change does it make in the way people make up their minds to be attached to things?

Return to Practice Literature.

But how to get form objects to matter-of-concerns to things? How do they manage to bring in the relevant parties? Also, I do some occasional freelance work, where disciplines differ from web-design to workshops to product design.

From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – An Introduction to Making Things Public |

How can this be achieved? A catalog of questions in this text. While always describing the how, and the procedures around the issue, when it comes down to what the issue is, political philosophy has remained silent throughout history. Here he makes the argument for disagreement and cohabiting, especially with indifferences. Please Visit Reserve Page. Dingpolitk brings us back to shoving stuff in a room…though how this is “eloquent” is anyone’s guess. Latour continuous by pointing out latouur another mistake made in Western political history is that it focused on settling differences, instead of trying to co-evolve with a set of indifferences.


Dante and Francesca da Rimini: Views Read View source View history. In further discussing the political Western history, the next and important point to make is that of the shift from politics of time to politics laour space. Added to PP index Total downloads 9of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? The point to make is that objects trigger dinypolitik connections of public, or at least shared, issues.

Latour blames this on the dichotomy in the explanation of the word representation. Perspectives for an Alternative Parliamentarism.

Can There Be Global Justice? Where objects used to be looked at as a literally matters-of fact, this is false, or at least too narrow of a view on the matter.