Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy by Lawrence Lessig. Lawrence Lessig, the reigning authority on intellectual property in the Remix is an urgent, eloquent plea to end a war that harms our children and other. Ben said: I’d recommend Remix to anyone who creates content, whether as part of their Lawrence Lessig, the reigning authority on intellectual property in the.
|Published (Last):||18 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||15.47 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy
The idea that the library gets to say when and what I read is outrageous. Were it painting, it would be called collage.
As he sees it, reforming copyright law is the only way to salvage it: Lawrence Lessig lrssig a ton of common sense into the debate about Copyright and the 21st Century media remixes our society expects.
Alone, however, this layer would be worth very little. By embracing aread-write culture, a which allows its users to create art as readily as they consume it, we can ensure that creators get the supportaartistic, commercial, and ethicalathat they deserve and need.
As a result, our children will be unable to understand a world where Thursday at 10 p. Why is beyond me. Sony knew this was too much but wanted to set a baseline for the negotiations that would follow.
Lessig law, Stanford Univ. It also offers an inspiring vision of the post-war world where enormous opportunities await those who view art as a resource to be shared openly rather than a commodity to be hoarded. My disappointments notw I wish that I had read this book years ago. The twentieth century changed us in many obvious ways.
But again, no luck.
Lawrence Lessig: Re-examining the remix | TED Talk
Grokster,4 my local public-radio station aired a story about the case. One RO is fueled by professionals. Like a great essay or a funny joke, a remix draws upon the work of others in order to do new work.
But just as bad writing is not an argu- ment against writing, bad remix is not an argument against remix.
Lessig resurrects the testimony of American composer John Phillip Sousa, who went before Congress in to discuss copyright reform: He argued back, equal to equal. They did the same for a non- profit venue in Vienna three months later, but mentioned that Ms. In each studio was a fan of John Lennon. Nel suo sforzo di dare un poco ragione a tutti i partecipanti alla disputa, Lessig ricorda come il diritto di riutilizzare parti della produzione creativa altrui sia sempre stato la ragion d’essere fondamentale della cultura, fin da quando esiste.
That some- one worked for Universal Music Group. Whoever wins, the other must lose.
Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy: Lawrence Lessig: Bloomsbury Academic
Collateral damage is the focus of this book. Amateurism, to this professional, was a virtue—not because it produced great music, but because it produced a musical culture: That was lawrdnce point: Every lawyer must feel responsible for the law he or she helps make After a couple of months, she received a response from one of Ms.
Retrieved from ” https: Enabling the Future 9. Lessig finishes the book in Part III by discussing the ways in which we can enable the cooperation and co-existence of culture and commerce in the future. The most hysterical part of the book for me was the mention of Blip as it is now a non-entity, having shut down recently.
And not by scolding me for my abusive fax, but for my apology. For many, new technologies have made it irresistible to flout these unreasonable lewsig ultimately untenable laws.
Lawrence Lessig: Decriminalizing the Remix
Who will they become? I doubt you could do it. All three changes, if allowed, will be valu- able and important. So too was it true that I thought my comments were unfair.